politicalantibody:

projectxa3:

nanoochka:

techno-gal:

fromacomrade:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Please do not pass this by without reading it

Louder for the people in the back:

No sympathy, no quarter, and no mercy

Don’t forget No Peace. Don’t give them a fucking minute.

Do not be afraid to label someone a Nazi if the shoe fits. Then feel free to punch them in the face or kick them in the balls. Just to make them understand that they are not welcome in the public square.

(via im2tired4usernames)

cathkaesque:

mishpacha:

class-struggle-anarchism:

While all of Europe is responsible, I think it’s also important for people from the UK to acknowledge the particular and direct culpability of our government in what has happened in Israel and Palestine - mostly because it never is. Politicians don’t mention it, the media never mentions it, they tell you nothing about it in school, no one talks about it. I was just saying exactly the same thing about India, but if you ask an average British person if they think their country did a good job of ruling Palestine you’ll get a blank stare, maybe they’ll pull a massively uninformed opinion out of their arse, I doubt many could tell you exactly when it was. But the fact is that when Britain assumed control of the Holy land in 1918 both Zionism and Palestinian nationalism were relatively minor concerns, and when we left in 1948 there was a civil war raging between those two sides. All of the important seeds of the conflict were sown and took root while Britain was in charge. The first major Palestinian uprising of 1936-39 was an anti-colonial struggle against the British Empire. 

But today, watching the news, British people are like ‘wow guess we’ll never understand why Jews and Arabs just naturally hate each other’… just like those Hindus and Muslims in India and Pakistan, and those Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland’….. and all of those other places on earth where the legacy of British occupation and partition is division, violence and misery. The Empire is not a distant memory we can feel vaguely proud and nostalgic about (as most British people apparently do) it was a global crime of almost unimaginable proportions and it’s still (in some cases quite literally) blowing up in our faces. 

Or Nigeria with the Igbo and Yoruba.  Or Sri Lanka with the ‎Sinhalese‎ and Tamils.  Or Zanzibar with the Arabs and Bantu.

If you want a good documentary on the unholy mess Britain made of Palestine, I really recommend End of Empire. It’s part of a series that looks at a whole host of British attempts at decolonisation. 

(via outerspacejellyfish)

magz:

cryptic-ink:

psychoticallytrans:

feelthemonster:

image

I’m not a psychology researcher, but my guess would be that the nature of it being a time-limited puzzle game where you have to juggle multiple factors means that your short-term memory gets filled and the traumatic images are “dumped” in favor of remembering how many times to rotate the L piece. “As soon as possible” is probably because the sooner you do it, the less likely it is to become part of your long-term memory.

If that is true, then other time-limited activities where you have to remember and plan in a tight time frame may serve a similar purpose.

This can have an effect hours after the traumatic event happens too! All participants were treated within about 6 hours and played for a total of 20 minutes of Tetris (with at least one play time of 10 minutes straight).

Here are the links given in the screenshot:

Here is the paper that the second link uses as a source:

ID:

Screenshot of tweet by Glenn White @justicar.xyz on October 13, 2023, that say:

“Reminder that if you see disturbing or traumatic images, playing Tetris as soon as possible afterwards can help the brain cleanse itself and lessen the impacts of it longer term.


No, I’m not kidding. And no one knows how or why it works. But it
Does work, and I encourage you to remember it.

Lest people think I’m kidding:

(insert links shown above).”

End ID.

(via robinasnyder)

ufonaut:

image
image
image
image
image

“Because I wanted you to know what I know– that you have friends.”

“I told you, I work alone.”

“I’m not talking about the super friends, Mr… Scott.”

The first five pages of Alan Scott: The Green Lantern (2023) #1, featured in The New Golden Age: Special Edition (2023) #1.

(Tim Sheridan, Cian Tormey)

…what if Arthur is desperate for new allies because Scratch put the fear in him that ‘nothing gold can stay’ and he won’t always have John so he has to prepare for a life without him just like Kayne planted the seeds with the knife and the reminder of Daniel’s words to try and create a self-fulfilling prophecy where he’s pushing John away on purpose try and save himself from the pain of losing the last person he has only that’s exactly what is slowly cracking them apart.

malevolent podcast malevolent ep 36 malevolent spoilers “nothing gold can stay” don't mind me it's just raining on my face

teaboot:

helloelicia:

vmohlere:

ruinconstellation:

teaboot:

amygdalae:

From the US but i spell grey with an e because e just feels like a much greyer letter than a

grey with an E is dusty neutral but gray with an A is bluish and darker

it really is, huh

Omg I’ve found my people

It’s because GRAY is a West Saxon word for the quality of light, while GREY is an Anglian word for everyday objects. And everyday objects are typically earthy, warmer, or more neutral.

To explain: West Saxon and Anglian are both dialects of Old English. West Saxon was the politically dominant dialect, but Anglian was the more popular spoken dialect. So a lot of Old English texts are written in West Saxon, but what we know as Middle English and Modern English descended more from Anglian because it was spoken by more people.

So grey (the Anglian word) shows up when authors are describing everyday stuff. Like in this sentence describing a grey beard from Holy Boke Gratia Dei: “The hed of Petir is a brood face with mech her on his berd and that is of grey colour be twix whit and blak.”

Any Middle English text you read, you’ll find Anglian grey is the word the author prefers to describe everyday things. Grey wool, grey feathers, grey stones, grey horses.

By contrast, gray (the West Saxon word) shows up when authors are describing the qualities of light.

A gleaming gray sword, a deep gray lake, a misty gray morning, cold gray marble, sad gray eyes. Like in this sentence from The Siege of Jerusalem: “They glowes of graie steel that were with gold hemmyd.” More often than not, gray describes an impermanent or glimmering quality of light.

There’s even an instance where a Middle English author uses both, and you can see how one spelling is more about the quality of light while the other is more about the color of the animal: “The cerkyl or the roundel off the eye ys sumtyme graye lyke the ey off a catte, sumtyme blak grey lyke the eyn off doggys.”

(“The circle or round of the eye is sometimes gray like the eye of a cat, sometimes black-grey like the eyes of dogs.”)

The reason Americans use gray and not grey is because Noah Webster hated the English. :)

so freakin cool

(via emilianadarling)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk